Not All Personal Data Can Be Anonymised, But All Personal Data Must Be Governed

Anonymisation is not only a privacy control. It is a governance and architecture decision about when personal data truly needs to remain identifiable.

“Just anonymise the data.”

It sounds simple. It sounds responsible. It sounds like the right answer in any privacy or data protection discussion.

But in real enterprise environments, anonymisation is rarely that simple.

Personal data does not sit quietly inside one application. It moves. It is copied. It is reported. It is extracted. It is shared. It is archived. It appears in dashboards, data warehouses, operational reports, audit trails, vendor support files, test environments, APIs, and sometimes even spreadsheets created outside formal system controls.

This is why anonymisation cannot be treated as a simple technical button.

It is not only a privacy control. It is a business, architecture, governance, and risk decision.

The difficult truth is this: not all personal data can be anonymised.

Some data must remain identifiable because the organisation still needs to know who the customer is, who owns the account, who performed the transaction, who approved the request, who raised the complaint, or who is entitled to receive a service.

A bank cannot fully anonymise customer data that is still required for account servicing. An investment institution cannot anonymise investor records that are still needed for regulatory reporting, dispute handling, audit, tax, or legal retention. A human resource system cannot anonymise employee records that are still required for payroll, benefits, disciplinary records, or statutory obligations.

When data is truly anonymised, it should no longer be possible to identify the individual, directly or indirectly. That is the point—but it is also the challenge.

If the business still needs to re-identify the individual, then full anonymisation may not be appropriate for that specific use case.

Read More

Akhirnya selepas 60 tahun, misteri cahaya dari kunang-kunang terungkai

Selama 60 tahun ahli saintis tidak dapat merungkai misteri di sebalik tindak balas kimia yang menghasilkan kerlipan cahaya yang terhasil dari abdomen kelip-kelip atau kunang-kunang. Memetik laporan National Geographic, saintis Bruce Branchini dari Kolej Connecticut bersama rakan-rakan setugasnya berjaya merungkai misteri itu dengan penemuan partikel elektron oksigen yang bertanggungjawab memancarkan cahaya. Eksperimen yang dijalankan Branchini mendapati oksigen yang terlibat dalam pemancaran cahaya kunang-kunang itu berbentuk khas dan dikenali sebagai ‘anion superoksida’. “Anion superoksida merupakan satu bentuk oksigen molekul yang mengandungi elektron tambahan,” kata Branchini sambil menambah ‘anion superoksida’ mungkin menyebabkan fenomena bio-pendarcahaya (bioluminescence dalam istilah Inggeris yang bermaksud penghasilan dan pemancaran cahaya oleh organisma hidup) lain di alam semula jadi. Hasil penemuan itu diterbitkan dalam sebuah jurnal berjudul, ‘Journal of the American Chemical Society' dan berjaya memberi gambaran komprehensif tentang proses biokimia yang berlaku dalam badan serangga itu. "Cara enzim dan protein mengubah tenaga kimia kepada cahaya adalah satu fenomena yang sangat asas dan kami ingin tahu bagaimana proses biokimia tersebut berlaku," kata Branchini dalam laporan itu. Kajian mendalam berhubung proses biokimia kunang-kunang dipercayai boleh memanfaatkan bidang penyelidikan kesihatan manusia di masa depan. Selamat Hari Merdeka ! Sumber